Site overview
Technológia pre modernú školu
Technológia pre modernú školu | ÁMOS vision
This domain is not being manually tracked yet, so the rank, traffic, authority, trust, and score values below are estimated from crawl, backlink, and registry signals. Traffic confidence: 47/100.
Overall ranking#15,213
Country Rank#113
Category Rank#6,174
Monthly Visitors118Est. confidence 47/100
Backlinks1
Referring Domains1
Authority score41/100
Trust score8/100
Safety score0/100
Fraud score0/100
Overall score14/100
Community scoreNeutral0 ratings · confidence 0/100
Evidence confidence0/100Homepage-weighted
External data
Inconclusive
External intelligence
External intelligence is now manual-only. Use Refresh data to trigger search and review intelligence gathering for this domain.
External intelligence is manual-only. A visitor must use Refresh data to trigger a new search and review evidence snapshot for this domain.
Decision state
Inconclusive
Search and review intelligence has not produced enough qualified evidence yet to harden the verdict.
External confidence
0/100
0 fetched documents · 0 facts
Evidence quality
Low
0 search results captured from the stored snapshot.
Entity coverage
0/100
0/100 source diversity · 0/100 fetch success
No stored third-party search snapshot is visible yet. External evidence will appear here once the first snapshot is ready.
Live scan
Idle
urlscan.io report
No urlscan.io report has been requested for this domain yet.
| Status | idle |
|---|---|
| Submitted URL | https://amosvision.sk/ |
| Result | Waiting for report |
| Primary IP | — |
| Country | — |
| HTTP status | — |
| Requests | — |
| Verdict | Waiting for verdict |
The card checks urlscan.io automatically and updates here as soon as the report finishes.
Why this score?
Evidence ledger
amosvision.sk currently scores 14/100. Risk signals are the main constraint on the score right now. Evidence confidence is still limited, so the score can move materially after more evidence is collected. This is an estimated profile rather than a manually tracked one. Crawler access looks clean.
Profile
Estimated profile
Evidence confidence
Low confidence
0/100
Traffic confidence
Moderate confidence
47/100
Crawler access
Clean visibility
Score movement
Quality system+30.3
Technical quality, crawl depth, page structure, and implementation hygiene. Current subsystem score: 89/100.
Reputation system+12.9
Authority, search visibility, reach, engagement, and registry stability. Current subsystem score: 38/100.
Safety system+0.0
Fraud, spam, and trust signals from infrastructure, crawl, and registry evidence. Current subsystem score: 0/100.
Risk clamp-29.0
High-risk signals forced the final score lower than the weighted base score.
Evidence freshness
Crawl evidence2026-03-15 20:55:40
Crawl and page content sample. Age: 28d ago.
WHOIS snapshotNot captured yet
Registry profile and stability signals.
Keyword view2026-04-13 13:41:23
Estimated visibility until tracked keyword snapshots exist. Age: 0s ago.
Rank history2026-04-13 13:41:23
Estimated trend derived from current profile and crawl signals. Age: 0s ago.
Audience geographyNot captured yet
Audience mix is estimated from available signals rather than first-party audience logs.
Authority and trust
41/100 · trust 8/100
118 monthly visitors, 70 organic keywords, brand completeness 46/100, engagement 78/100.
Backlink and search evidence
1 referring domains
1 backlinks across 1 referring domains. Diversity 92/100; spam penalty 0.
Registry and domain stability
0.0 years old
Stability 0/100 · age 0.0 years.
Safety and fraud posture
Safety 0/100 · fraud 0/100
Primary tag Uncertain · safety 0/100 · fraud 0/100.
Tag intelligence
Uncertain (70% match) because the evidence is mixed and external checks stayed inconclusive, so the system kept an uncertainty buffer instead of a harder automated verdict.
Uncertain
Uncertain
70%
External checks stayed inconclusive, so the model avoided a harder verdict.
Heuristic: The evidence is materially mixed or partially corroborated, so the model is avoiding a harder verdict.
Why: The evidence is mixed and external checks stayed inconclusive, so the system kept an uncertainty buffer instead of a harder automated verdict.
C
Caution
62%
Signals are mixed or weak, so this domain should be treated carefully.
Heuristic: The signal mix leans cautious and the site should be treated carefully until more evidence arrives.
Why: Review carefully: low trust score.
T
Trusted
49%
Strong trust, stability, and low-risk signals were detected.
Heuristic: A few positive trust signals were detected, but the evidence is still light.
Why: Low spam indicators plus strong trust, quality, registry, and stability signals were detected.
Strongest tag heuristic
Uncertain · 70%
The highest raw tag match from the heuristic engine before visibility thresholds and manual overrides.
Trust score
8/100
Confidence derived from authority, crawl quality, stability, and risk signals.
Authority score
41/100
A higher authority score usually means broader reputation and backlink confidence.
Spam risk
0/100
Lower is better. This blends spam indicators with false-positive protections for legitimate sites.
Quality score
86/100
Based on crawl quality, content completeness, and technical evidence.
Safety score
42/100
Higher is safer. Direct fraud signals can heavily cap this even when SEO signals look strong.
Fraud score
0/100
Lower is better. This reflects phishing, drainer, fake-support, fake-shop, and malware signals.
Infrastructure risk
0/100
Lower is better. This reflects the IP, registrar, and nameserver neighbourhood seen by the crawler.
Evidence confidence
18/100
Higher means the crawler had enough pages and registry evidence to make a stronger call.
External evidence
Low
Quality of the structured search and review evidence cluster.
External decision
Inconclusive
How third-party evidence compares with the current candidate tag.
NSFW score
0/100
Context-aware adult-content detection with medical / educational false-positive reduction.
Registry stability
0/100
Based on age, expiry runway, and the amount of ownership / registrar churn.
Registry & ownership
Domain age
—
Older domains generally carry more historical trust than very new ones.
Stability score
—
Penalised by registrar, ownership, and nameserver churn.
Days to expiry
—
Very short renewal windows can be a weak trust signal.
Registrar / ownership changes
0 / 0
Frequent ownership churn can weaken trust.
Nameserver changes
0
Repeated infrastructure changes can indicate instability.
DNSSEC / privacy
DNSSEC off · privacy off
DNSSEC strengthens DNS trust; privacy is neutral on its own.
Reputation & search evidence
Backlinks
1
Broader backlink evidence usually improves confidence.
Referring domains
1
Unique linking domains are more useful than raw link volume.
Organic keywords
70
Search footprint helps distinguish real sites from thin shells.
Indexed pages
82
Larger index coverage usually means more evidence to classify from.
Brand strength
46/100
Stronger brand signals reduce false positives for legitimate sites.
Risk label
GOOD
This is the raw crawl / heuristic risk label feeding the tag model.
Crawl, content & technicals
HTTP status
200
Healthy responses make classification more reliable.
HTTPS / speed
HTTPS weak · 245 ms
Slow or broken technical signals weaken confidence.
Content words
826
Thin pages are harder to trust and easier to manipulate.
Schema / structure
0 schema · meta · no H1
Structured markup and basic on-page hygiene improve quality confidence.
Links on page
50 internal · 4 external
Link patterns help detect thin directories and promo pages.
Page speed / mobile
98/100 · 76/100
Better technical quality generally reduces low-effort site patterns.
Crawl access
Open
The crawler reached the site without an anti-bot challenge.
External evidence & explainability
Decision state
Inconclusive
Search and review intelligence has not produced enough qualified evidence yet to harden the verdict.
Evidence quality
Low
Blends source trust, domain matching, evidence diversity, and freshness.
Support vs contradiction
0 / 0
Compares how much structured external evidence supports the candidate tag against evidence that contradicts it.
Qualified risk sources
No
Risk tags only promote from external evidence when source diversity or source trust thresholds are met.
Uncertainty buffer
Active
Prevents thin or mixed external evidence from forcing a stronger tag than the evidence can justify.
Positive signals
- Healthy crawl quality and on-page completeness.
Risk signals
- Trust score is currently very low.
- External evidence was mixed or sparse, so the tag model keeps an uncertainty buffer instead of overcommitting.
Search & review intelligence
External intelligence is now manual-only. Use Refresh data to trigger search and review intelligence gathering for this domain.
External intelligence is manual-only. Use Refresh data to trigger a fresh search and review snapshot for this domain.
Decision state
Inconclusive
Search and review intelligence has not produced enough qualified evidence yet to harden the verdict.
Evidence quality
Low
Source trust, entity match, freshness, and diversity.
Support / contradiction
0/0
How much external evidence supports the current tag versus contradicts it.
External confidence
0/100
0 fetched documents · 0 facts
Discovery layer
Queries0
Search intelligence discovers candidate evidence sources without blocking the page.
Exact matches0/100
How much of the discovery layer appears to reference this exact domain rather than a similar name.
Results found0
Raw search results considered before verification and extraction.
Entity coverage0/100
How strongly the discovered pages seem to refer to this exact domain.
Verification layer
Documents fetched0
Background verification fetches actual pages instead of relying only on snippets.
Source diversity0/100
Risk tags only promote when source trust or diversity thresholds are met.
Fetch success0/100
Shows how much of the shortlisted evidence set the server could actually fetch and verify.
Freshness0/100
Uses per-source decay instead of a flat one-size-fits-all expiry.
SEO data
| Organic keywords | 70 |
|---|---|
| Indexed pages | 82 |
| Dofollow backlinks | 100.00% |
| Page speed | 98/100 |
| Mobile friendliness | 76/100 |
| Search visits | 39.55% |
| Primary tag | Uncertain |
| Safety score | 0/100 |
| Legitimacy score | 0/100 |
| Infrastructure risk | 0/100 |
| Category confidence | — |
| Traffic confidence | 47/100 |
Category heuristics
Stored category Business
No stored category candidate breakdown is available for this domain yet.
Rating breakdown
Technical foundation
16/18
Authority & trust
12/30
Reach & market presence
3/18
Search visibility
3/12
Engagement & retention
9/10
Channels & diversification
4/6
Registry stability
0/6
Quality system
89/100
Reputation system
38/100
Safety system
0/100
Evidence confidence
0/100
Traffic sources
| Direct | 25.29% |
|---|---|
| Search | 35.41% |
| Social | 8.96% |
| Referral | 12.92% |
| 6.40% | |
| Paid | 11.02% |
Audience geography Estimated spread
Audience geography is estimated from category, country, traffic mix, and brand signals until first-party audience data is collected.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| SK | 63.50% |
| US | 13.03% |
| GB | 10.43% |
| AU | 6.52% |
| CA | 6.52% |
Crawl inspector
| robots.txt | 200 |
|---|---|
| Sitemap | 200 |
| URLs in sitemap | 82 |
| Crawl access | Open |
- No H1 heading was detected.
Good backlinks
| Source | Link type | Status | Why it looks good |
|---|---|---|---|
| amosvision.cz | DOFOLLOW | Active | This backlink looks relatively healthy based on the available signals. |
Toxic backlinks
Review these links and consider disavowing them if they are manipulative or irrelevant.
| Source | Link type | Status | Tags | Advice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No toxic backlinks detected yet. | ||||
Backlink history
Historical backlink records now keep the last-seen state so lost backlinks do not vanish silently.
| Source | Type | Status | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amosvision.cz | DOFOLLOW | Active | 2026-03-15 19:08:04 | 2026-03-15 19:08:04 |
Registry / WHOIS
Registry data has not been captured yet. It will be fetched automatically.
Registry stability signals
| Domain age | 0.0 years |
|---|---|
| Stability score | 0/100 |
| Registrar changes | 0 |
| Ownership changes | 0 |
| Nameserver changes | 0 |
| Days to expiry | — |
Top keywords Estimated visibility
Top keywords are estimated from crawl language, brand, category, and visibility signals until tracked keyword snapshots are stored.
| Keyword | Position | Engine | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technológia pre modernú školu | #20 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| Technológia pre modernú školu business | #22 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| Technológia pre modernú školu reviews | #24 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| technol | #26 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| gia | #28 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| pre | #30 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| modern | #32 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
| kolu | #34 | Estimated | 2026-04-13 13:41:23 |
Recent rank history Estimated trend
Rank history is estimated from the current profile because no stored history exists for this domain yet.
| Date | Worldwide | Country | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-02 13:41:23 | #16,308 | #121 | #6,619 |
| 2026-03-09 13:41:23 | #15,943 | #118 | #6,470 |
| 2026-03-16 13:41:23 | #15,578 | #116 | #6,322 |
| 2026-03-23 13:41:23 | #15,213 | #113 | #6,174 |
| 2026-03-30 13:41:23 | #14,848 | #110 | #6,026 |
| 2026-04-06 13:41:23 | #14,483 | #108 | #5,878 |
| 2026-04-13 13:41:23 | #14,118 | #105 | #5,729 |